Most of us on this team didn’t expect employment law to feel so personal.
It sounded straightforward: contracts of work, pay, holidays, a few rules about fairness. Then came our first problem question. A warehouse worker is dismissed two weeks after raising a safety concern, her employer says she was never really an employee, a colleague on a zero-hours arrangement is told his shifts have simply stopped, a manager’s email hints at a restructure nobody announced, and one line at the bottom reads: “Advise Priya.” We read it three times and still couldn’t tell whether it was a status question, a dismissal question, a discrimination question, or all three at once. We also remember how heavy it felt, because behind every employment case is a real person whose income, routine, and sense of worth were on the line.
If employment law feels like a subject with too many moving parts right now, you’re in the right place. We’re not here to lecture you. We’d like to sit beside you, work through it together, and help you find your own way.
Employment law makes capable students doubt themselves. It draws on contract, statute, tort, equality law, human rights, and regulation all at once, and it comes with its own vocabulary: employee, worker, and contractor status, implied terms, unfair and constructive dismissal, redundancy, restrictive covenants, vicarious liability. You’re expected to follow the rules, understand the policy tensions behind them, and write about it clearly, to a word count, by Friday.
These are the things students tell us in their very first message:
If any of that sounds like you, take a breath. It doesn’t mean you’re in the wrong course. It means nobody has shown you the method yet, and the method can be learned.
We’ve all opened a database at 10 p.m. to look up one thing and surfaced two hours later with forty tabs and a cold cup of tea. So let’s sort it out together. We’ll show you how to find the right legislation, the leading cases, tribunal decisions, regulator guidance, and the journal article that makes your argument come alive. We’ll walk you through Westlaw, LexisNexis, HeinOnline, BAILII, and AustLII, plus free official sources. We’ll also show you how to check that a case is still good law and whether a provision has been amended.
Employment law changes often, shaped by new legislation, gig-economy litigation, and shifting working patterns. We’ll help you spot recent developments so your answer stands on the law as it is today.
Nobody expects you to carry cases around in your head like phone numbers. Try thinking of them as stories. A delivery rider told he is “his own boss” while following rules set by the platform. A nurse dismissed after speaking up about patient care. A new parent who returns from leave to find her role has changed. And a tribunal or court deciding, carefully, where the line between a fair and unfair employer should fall. When you can picture the people, the case stays with you.
We’ll show you how to read a case the way a lawyer does: what happened, what the court was really being asked, what it decided, and why. Then we’ll help you join the dots. Why do courts look at the reality of a working relationship rather than the label on the contract? Why does the law treat the bargaining power of employer and employee differently from ordinary commercial parties? Once the why makes sense, an unexpected twist in the exam room feels far less scary.
Most marks are lost on problem questions not because students don’t know the law, but because they don’t know where to begin. So here is a way in, one gentle step at a time:
It feels clunky the first few times. Then, quietly, it becomes your instinct. We’ll practise with realistic examples until it does.
“Too descriptive” might be the most baffling feedback in law school. Usually it means you’ve told the reader what the law says, but not what you make of it. And employment law is full of questions worth arguing about. Do the status tests protect people in the gig economy, or leave them behind? Is unfair dismissal law too generous to employers, or not generous enough? How far should the law restrict what an employee can do after leaving a job? Can equality law ever fully remove workplace disadvantage? We’ll help you pick a position, treat the other side fairly, draw on academic voices, and finish with a conclusion that truly answers the question you were asked.
Sharing your work takes a bit of courage. We know. When you send us a draft you’ve written yourself, we’ll read it carefully and tell you what’s working, what isn’t, and why. We’ll look at structure, clarity, legal accuracy, and referencing in OSCOLA, AGLC, Bluebook, or whatever your department uses. And we’ll explain our thinking, so what you learn carries into your next piece of work.
If it’s on an employment law syllabus, chances are we’ve talked it through with someone already:
Studying in England and Wales, the United States, Australia, India, or Canada? We’re comfortable in all of them, so tell us what your course expects and we’ll shape our help around it.
We want to be upfront with you, because you deserve that.
We don’t write assignments for students to hand in. Universities treat that as academic misconduct, and in some countries, including Australia, commercial cheating services are an offence. But the real reason is simpler. We’ve watched what happens to students who go that route: they scrape through one deadline and walk into the next exam feeling just as lost.
What we offer is help that stays with you. Our explanations, outlines, and worked examples on different facts are study aids, there to build your understanding so that what you submit is genuinely your own. Please always follow your university’s academic integrity policies.
We’d much rather help you become someone who can do this on your own. It’s more rewarding for us, and far more useful for you.
First, tell us what’s going on. Send your question, your deadline, and whatever is worrying you. Messy is fine. You don’t need it all figured out.
Then we make a plan together. Maybe it’s a research walkthrough, maybe a session on untangling a multi-issue problem question, maybe feedback on a draft.
You learn, practise, and write. We offer clear explanations and examples. You turn them into your own answer.
Finally, we look it over with you. Share your draft and we’ll help you polish it before you submit.
You set the pace. One quick session before a deadline is perfectly fine. So is regular support all semester.
Employment law can feel like a tangle of statutes, tests, and exceptions. But it’s also one of the most human areas of law, because it deals with how people earn a living, how they are treated at work, and what fairness should mean when one side holds most of the power. Once it clicks, you start noticing it in every job advert, every contract, and every news story about work.
Every student who has ever felt lost in it has eventually found their footing. Sometimes all it takes is someone explaining it a little differently, or pointing out the one thing you’ve been missing.
If you’d like that kind of help, we’d love to hear from you. Send us your question, tell us what’s tricky, and we’ll take it from there, together.
Reach out today, and let’s turn “I don’t get this” into “Oh, I get it now.”
No. We’ll help you research, plan, understand, and improve, but what you submit must be yours.
Yes. This is one of the most common sticking points, and we’ll walk through it with realistic examples until it feels natural.
Often not. Reach out as soon as you can and we’ll be honest about what’s realistic.
Gladly. We can work through practice questions, build a revision plan, and share ways to stay calm and organised under pressure.
Yes. Your work and your details are treated with care and respect.
Add a review
Please login to post your review ?